Part 1: What we do at the Wildlife Refuge What is the value of the Adirondack
Wildlife Refuge to the
citizens of New York? The DEC wants us to give up our ambassador
animals,
rehoming them to other wildlife educational centers, and I believe it
is only
fair that the public hear our side of the story. In the first part,
I’ll review
what we do here, what wildlife rehabilitators do, and in the second
part, I’ll
discuss our relationship with the DEC. My wife is Wendy Hall, and we founded
the Adirondack
Wildlife Refuge in Wilmington. We’ve met many of you, as well as your
children
and grand children, when you visited and saw wolves, bears, eagles, and
many
other interesting animals, and learned all about their roles in Nature.
I’ve
written many articles for the Almanack, see https://www.adirondackalmanack.com/author/shall,
and I’m currently working on my 4th book, three of them
about
Adirondack critters, see http://www.adirondackwildlife.org. I’ve always been fascinated with
nature, and I’ve worked
with wolves for 30 years and bears about ten. Wendy is a very fine
artist, a
retired nurse, a first-rate rehabber, and an expert on birds of prey.
Wendy is
70 years old and suffering from an inoperable sarcoma. In the
heartbreaking
world of cancer so many families are familiar with, her oncologists at
Fletcher
Allen and Havard Medical School give her four to six months to live. We moved up to the Adirondacks twenty
years ago, and with
Wendy essentially retired, a weekend hobby of wildlife rehabilitation
became a
passion. We work with veterinarians, some of whom work pro bono. Our
oldest son,
Dr. Dan Hall, is a Veterinary Cardiologist while our youngest, Alex
Hall, is a
medic with the Vermont National Guard, just home from Saudi Arabia, and
an
expert on working with wildlife in general, and wolves and bears in
particular. When you rehab wild animals, most are
Rescued, Rehabbed and
Released back into the wild, many examples here.
Many of the others die despite your best efforts, while the smallest
percentage,
often a bird of prey which can not fly, will only survive if they are
fed and
cared for. This last group become “ambassador” or “educational”
animals, and
these are the ones you meet at the Wildlife Refuge. Some folks prefer
to never
have wildlife in enclosures but may not realize that starvation is the
number
one killer of wildlife, and any animal that lives at the Refuge will
double or
triple their lifespan, as their most critical need is taken care of. It
would
be like you winning the lottery once a year. We have a red
fox named “Pippin”, who is fifteen. He was sent to another center
yesterday. Wild foxes are lucky to reach their seventh birthday, and
death by
what we call “old age” is a rare occurrence in nature. Incidentally, fox and other meso
predators are our number
one defense against Lyme disease, just based on the sheer volume of
rodents
they consume. The black legged tick picks up the Lyme borrelia bacteria
from
rodents, which they pass on to you, so wouldn’t it be logical to ban
the
trapping of all rodent eating meso predators? Trapping may be the
cruelest of
outdoor human activities. Unlike hunting, where you hopefully can see
what you
are aiming at, we’ve ended up rehabbing eagles, hawks and owls who were
captured in traps set for fox and other small predators. The DEC not
only
encourages trapping, they provide a mentoring program for kids under
12! I
assume the reason there are only 10,000 licensed trappers in the state,
is
because the other twenty million citizens, which includes over a
million with
hunting licences, find trapping repugnant. Some of the animals you meet are
adopted to fill an
educational requirement. Everything in nature is connected, from plants
and
fungi to blue whales, and the context of our educational presentations
is how
all that works together and comprises the natural world. We don’t have
gray
wolves today in the Adirondacks. We have a canid relative, an eastern
coyote or
coywolf, often mistakenly called a coydog, which is in reality a
hybridized
cross between the Eastern or Algonquin wolf, and the western coyote,
and is
often reported as a wolf, as Coywolves
are
considerably larger than the western coyotes you’ll see in Yellowstone
or
Yosemite. One of the members of the NPO board, Jon Way, wrote “Suburban
Howls”, about studying the coywolf in Massachusetts. Wolves
are critical in understanding nature, as they take the familiar concept
of an
apex predator, top of their food chain, and develop it into what we
call a
keystone predator, which has a dramatic impact on any habitat they
occupy.
Through their predatory behavior, they inadvertently control the number
of prey
species, such as deer, elk and beaver, but they also go after their
competitors,
such as coyotes, to prevent competition for the prey wolves prefer.
Coyotes in
turn go after fox, etc. Nature is a hard place to make a living, and
nowhere
near as benign as we prefer to think it is. Wolves have been sucked into that crazy
political whirlwind
the country is immersed in, with the amusing result that half the
country loves
wolves, the other half hates them, and neither side typically knows
anything
about them beyond media cliches and unsubstantiated claims. What is
clear is
that we have greatly exceeded the habitat carrying capacity for deer
and
coyotes, and have way too many deer, way too many coyotes, and the
reason is
simple. Bowing to pressure from ranching and hunting lobbyists, our
federal and
state governments began campaigns to eliminate gray wolves, ignoring
scientist’s warnings that the result would be explosions of deer and
coyotes.
Coyotes are a much bigger problem with livestock than wolves ever were. The other reason wolves are critical is
that all dogs are
genetically gray wolves. My second book, “Wolves,
Humans, Dogs and Civilization” makes the claim that we didn’t
domesticate
wolves, but more likely some of the wolves realized that working with
our
ancestors 50,000 years ago on the Mammoth Steppe, first inadvertently
and later
on purpose, meant an easier safer life, and they domesticated
themselves. Wolves
have the most dangerous job in nature, and few live beyond their
fifth year.
Attacking animals anywhere from two to twenty times your own size is
not a
prescription for a long life. Human hunters have greater success when
working
with dogs, so any wolf helping one of our hunter-gatherer ancestors was
much
less likely to starve. Our earliest “dogs” were just gray
wolves, and it was the Agricultural
Revolution, starting about 15,000 years ago, when we began selectively
breeding
our wolves (unnatural selection) to perform jobs beyond hunting, for
example
shepherding, protection and eventually surrogate children. In effect,
when you
learn all about wolves and their actual behavior, it’s a very good
introduction
to how nature actually works. Just as wolves teach you how nature
works, bears
are what we call
an indicator species, that is, a species whose success or failure is a
good
indication of how well a habitat is performing, in terms of allowing a
species
to make a living while avoiding disease and predation. We have rescued,
rehabbed and released many Adirondack black bears over the years, and
the main
issues are starvation, as well as mange and other parasites. The two
black
bears you meet at the Wildlife Refuge are adopted from an org in
Minnesota,
where their parents are among the animals raised to appear in movies,
photo
shoots, etc. That’s why we affectionately call them “fake bears”. We know what bears eat, and what
diseases and other threats
they encounter, so the condition of bears can be a window into how well
a
habitat is performing. Black bears have lived in North America for half
a
million years, and unfortunately shared habitat with short-faced bears,
saber
tooth cats and dire wolves, which helps explain why black bears climb
trees
when threatened, except when the object is to harvest fruit and nuts. There are between seven and eight
thousand black bears in
New York State, at least half of them in the Adirondacks. Hunters kill
about a
quarter of New York’s bears every year. There has been only one fatal
attack by
a black bear in New York State in the last 120 years. They are
fascinating
creatures of high intelligence whose problem-solving capability has
been
demonstrated to many a high peaks hiker, who did not carry a bear
canister to try
to make their food inaccessible. In fact, carrying a canister is now
the law
when camping out in the High Peaks. My book, “Tooth
and Claw: Adirondack Mammals” contains a good introduction to bears.
|
Adirondack
Wildlife Refuge and the DEC, Part 2: Our Relationship with the DEC Adirondack Wildlife Refuge regulated by
both federal and
state agencies, with a fair amount of overlap, a troubling circumstance
when
both fed and state governments are always telling us how broke they
are. The
state agency is the Special Licenses Department of the Department of
Environmental
Conservation. We require two licenses to do what we’ve done at the
Adirondack
Wildlife Refuge: The Wildlife Rehabilitators License, which allowed
Wendy and
her Rehab Interns to take in injured and otherwise debilitated
wildlife, and do
Rescue, Rehab and Release. The Collect and Possess License allows
us to display
non-releasable animals, as well as those ambassador animals, such as
the wolves
and bears. Rehab is not only a voluntary past time, but as rehab
instances
increase, there is a good investment of time and money. We are not rich
people,
and we do not know anyone doing rehab who does it to make money. When
our initial
NPO was first certified by the IRS ten years ago, we used donations
from the
public, and those who follow our activities through social media and
newsletters, to allow us to expand, build new enclosures, pay for
animal food
and care, and to pay the six full time employees required to support
the
critters and educate the public. My wife Wendy was the administrative
interface to the state
and feds, responsible for reporting activities and keeping a
bewildering array
of forms and permits up to date. This was, in retrospect, a mistake,
probably
my fault, as I would have been a better choice, being more computer and
PDF
savvy than Wendy, but I do a lot of travel to Alaska, Western Canada,
Labrador,
Nova Scotia, New Foundland and Yellowstone, where I observe and get
inspired. The
last thing I wanted was to be a clerk. As you can see from her pastels, Wendy
is an artist, as well
as a natural caregiver for both people and animals, and a constant
volunteer.
When we lived downstate, she was the head of the Kent volunteer
ambulance unit.
As a clerk, she proved to be inept at keeping DEC records current, so
we’d get
into a “you do it”, “no, you do it” debate, one of those discussions
anyone who
has ever been married can appreciate. The rules she violated are themselves
confusing and hard to
follow. For example, one rule says that the rehabber can not mix
animals under
rehab with animals who are permanent residents. An animal at the Refuge
is not
classified by Wendy or the DEC, but by attending veterinarians, who
decide
whether the animal can be released back into the wild or classified as
non-releasable. As usual, the devil is in the details. Take Barred
Owls,
probably the most successful owl in the country when measured by range
and
numbers, and who are often struck by cars while diving at or mantling
over prey.
Let’s further say a barred owl’s wing is broken in such a way, it
cannot be
repaired, and will have to become an ambassador or educational animal
somewhere
else, to avoid being euthanized. One solution is the International Wildlife Rehabilitation
Council
or IWRC, which among other valuable services, connects rehabbers who
wish to
adopt out non-releasable critters to other educational facilities that
want to
accept an animal or trade another critter. Problem is, it’s very tough
to place
barred owls, because almost all educators already have too many. Since both the DEC and wildlife
regulatory bodies from other
states must approve all moves, a very cumbersome and tax consuming
process to
put it mildly, veterinarians do not reclassify the barred owl as
non-releasable
until the arrangement is struck. In other words, if we have a barred
owl in an
enclosure that we know will never be able to live in the wild again,
but has
not been reclassified as non-releasable, and a visitor is able to reach
that
enclosure, we have violated the regulation even though all parties know
that
Wendy did not violate the spirit of the regulation, which is that
releasable
animals should not be displayed to the public, because you want
releasable
animals to be afraid of people, as they’ll live a longer life when they’re returned to the wild. Another odd violation concerns the
bears. We were charged
with not having a DEC issued ear tag on Luvey, our brown phase black
bear. Ear
tags identify bears the way in which leg bands identify individual
loons, a
useful tool in understanding and learning about species. Bears engage
in rough
play, and Luvey lost her ear tag while tussling with Ahote. Bears must be anesthesized to attach
the ear tags. State law
forbids the Refuge from having anesthesizing drugs on hand, so the DEC
must
anesthesize the bear and attach the ear tags. We are wary of
anesthesizing any
animals unless their life may be at stake, as overdoses and negative
reactions do
happen. Why captive bred bears used as
ambassador animals need ear tags is one question, but another is why
the DEC
would hold us responsible for not being able to attach a new ear tag.
Can they
produce an email in which they requested to come by and attach a new
ear tag? The DEC ended up not only suspending
her Rehab License, but
now, in the final months of Wendy’s life, they are not only declining
to let
Wendy die peacefully, they are also declining to pass the Head Rehabber
license
to other very qualified and experienced people who work at the Refuge,
ensuring
that a valuable educational resource can reorganize and continue to
serve the
citizens of New York. The Adirondacks only has three wildlife
rehabbers that I’m
aware of, so it’s hard to see how this decision is good for wildlife.
Part of
rehabbing is transport, getting animals which would benefit from
Rehabbing from
where they’re collected to where they can be rehabbed. Keep in mind
that the
Adirondacks is such a huge area, the entire state of Vermont would fit
inside the
blue line. The DEC decision was so draconian, it meant Wendy could not
even
help residents with injured wildlife, other wildlife rehabbers, or even
DEC
field personnel, many of whom call us for advice. In other words, the state views
Rehabbing as a privilege,
not a service to wildlife or the public. If you want to legally kill a
bear in
New York State, the license fee is $22. If you wish to rehab bears, the
fee is relentless
micro-management by the DEC. Two of the bears we have successfully
rescued,
rehabbed and released over the years ended up being taken by hunters.
We are
not opposed to hunting, but there is something sadly paradoxical about
this
scenario. In addition, Wendy has been a volunteer
for North Country Wild
Care, an org
based in Saratoga with members mainly concentrated around the Albany
area, for
over ten years, answering their 24 hour wildlife hotline, and helping
to line
up resources to deal with rehab situations. Her impending death makes
this
academic, but it demonstrates just what impact the DEC decision has,
and makes
you wonder again who is it designed to help. The Collect and Possess license
suspension is also difficult
to understand when you try to figure out who benefits from it. As many
of you
know, our two black bears escaped about three years ago, and one of
them
escaped again briefly this past June. This is mainly my fault, as I
took over
the bears and their enclosure from the bear keeper in charge of the
bears at
the time of the initial escape, and I did considerable rebuilding to
try to
make the enclosure more secure. The first escape was an odd hit on
social media, as folks
followed our attempts to find the bears and bring them home. We were
aware that
some of our followers were seeing the bears, and we asked them to
notify us
ASAP, not on Facebook, but on the phone, which would help us respond
more
quickly, while building a rudimentary map of sightings, most of which
seemed to
be within about 4 or 5 miles from the Refuge. We were astonished to discover this, as
it indicated that
our prodigal bears were using the howling of our gray wolves to orient
their
own positions viz a viz the Refuge. This led to a sighting which
allowed me to
find Luvey, our brown phase black bear, on the back of Steward
Mountain, after
which she followed Hanna and I four miles through the woods and bogs
back to
the Refuge. Two days later, Ahote (a HOPI word meaning “spirit in the
wind”), our
larger black sow, was discovered only a mile up the hill from the
Refuge, after
which she dutifully followed Hanna and Caroline back home to the
Refuge. During this period, I requested bear
enclosure standards
fromJoe Therrien, the head of DEC's Special Licenses who did not
respond. I was quite
surprised at
how often our questions to authorities were completely ignored, as my
background was in private enterprise where communications is not only
helpful, but
key. The only public comment we saw from the DEC while the bears were
missing
was that they could not know for sure whether the bears were dangerous,
even
though statistics on bear attacks in New York State suggest otherwise.
There are about 8,000 bears in New York State, most in the Adirondacks
and Catskills, and hunters take about a quarter of the bears every
year. In the last 150 years, one person has been killed by a bear in NY
State, so you are far more likely to be electrocuted by your toaster,
drown in your bathtub, or be killed by a lightening strike or a falling
branch. When they forced us to rehome the
bears, Ahote died from stress. The DEC cites two “credible” witnesses
to Wendy’s violations,
disgruntled former employees, one of whom, Connor Schmitz, was fired
after causing an
accident
through reckless driving, an act witnessed by three people, including
myself. While apologizing for the accident, Connor basically refused to
take any responsibility. It was plain old dumb luck that no one in the
other car was injured, but I paid $5000 to repair the other car. Since
he was the driver of the car, and since I appreciated that $5,000 would
be a huge hit for a young man, I asked that he at least chip in $1,250
to help with the expense. After all, the accident was a direct cause of
his driving. He refused. Connor worked at the Refuge on and off
for years, and I mentored him, acting like a surrogate father. When he
was thinking about joining the Peace Corps, I was the one who convinced
him it was a good idea for life experience, and I was the one who spoke
to Peace Corps officials to convince them to let Connor serve in Nepal
for a couple of years. All these events, including the accident occured
before witnesses, in case anyone doubts the veracity of these
observations. We had been receiving complaints about
Connor from other employees and volunteers. We're not psychologists,
but in our judgement, Connor suffered from what is colloquially often
called a Napolean complex. He kept begging us through emails to be put
in charge as curator or general manager of the Refuge, suggestions we
rejected, because Hanna Cromie, an excellent rehabber, animal handler
and presenter, along with our youngest son Alex, a medic in the Vermont
National Guard, often dubbed "WolfMan", because of his uncanny ability
to relate to and work with animals, were in our opinion better suited
for the position. The second
witness, Melissa Sheely, like Connor, lived at the Refuge, and was
Connor's girlfriend, despite company policies from the employee
handbook against fraternizing on the job. She tried to take revenge on
my firing of Connor by reporting the Refuge to the
Better
Business Bureau, apparently unaware that the Bureau contacts targets of
bad
reviews for response. When we gave evidence of the lies and distortions
in the
review, the BBB declined to publish it. She then tried to claim that
she hadn't written the review, but s friend did. Why a friend wouldn't
simply be honest and use her own name was never explained. In a real
civil Court of Law,
such
witnesses as Connor and Melissa would be discredited because of the
timing of their reports
and the
obvious alternative motives involved. Meanwhile, we have invested over
$200,000 in the last year
to fix all violations cited in the DEC complaint. All mammal enclosures
have
been rebuilt, and the USDA, which licenses us for “Dangerous Animals”,
as well
as the DEC, insisted that all smaller education facilities like the
Wildlife
Refuge, build a perimeter fence to enclose all the mammal enclosures. This means that even if an animal
figures out a way to break
out of his enclosure, each of which now features ZAA (Zoo Association
of
America) design standards, there is no longer any way for the critter
to leave
the grounds, or for trespassers or wildlife to find their way through
the
perimeter fence to the animal enclosures. Unimpressed, the DEC went
ahead and rescinded
Wendy’s Collect and Possess license anyway. They knew we were borrowing
money
to build the perimeter fence, and they knew there was no way they would
let the
Refuge keep any of the educational animals. Should a regulator take
violations personally
and behave in a mean-spirited and vengeful manner? Again, who does this help? Before we
moved to the
Adirondacks, I ran the Executive briefing Center for a large
communications company
in Manhattan next to Rockefeller Center…. A lot of public speaking,
interaction
with major clients and much international travel. What I love about private enterprise is
that it is
competitive. If you do not provide your customers with good support,
they go to
your competitors. When a problem develops, you focus on fixing the
problem, not
the blame. This usually involves some sort of negotiation involving an
improvement in the support process or product. All interested parties
are
brought to agreement through a compromise in which all parties get
something
important, as a means of improving, emphasisng the positive aspects of
the
process, not ending the process, but moving forward. What is the value of the Adirondack
Wildlife Refuge to the
citizens of New York State? For starters, 50,000 people visit the
Refuge every
year. To most Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Bureaus, that means more
hotel
and motel rooms, and more seats in restaurants. No one doubts that we
are
valuable to the local economies, and our reviews on Trip Advisor and
other
rating systems bear this out. More importantly, every school and
college within
100 miles of the Refuge, routinely sends their students to the Refuge,
so these
professors and teachers obviously see value in exposing their students
to our
education program. Throughout
this entire process, the DEC has never
discussed
or even acknowledged any values to the citizenry beyond their rules and
regulations. Wilmington
Town
Supervisor Roy Holzer wrote to the DEC, “The Wildlife Center has grown to be an important part of our community. The volunteers from this
organization are engaged and dedicated in their cause of Wildlife rehabilitation and education. The Refuge and Rehabilitation
Center is one of most unique
invaluable services provided in the Adirondack Park and North Country. Perhaps even the entire State of New York. Thousands of people come to the Refuge yearly. It is probably one of the most
visited places, second
to Whiteface Mountain in
the Town of
Wilmington. I have personally witnessed students
on a narrative tour of the services and programs they offer at this
facility.
The staff is knowledgeable and committed to the mission of this organization.” The Visitors Bureau wrote, “The Wildlife Refuge is by far the biggest attraction for all ages. I applaud them for offering both education and entertainment to those who may never see any wildlife outside of a traditional zoo or digital screen. Our hope is that the Refuge be able to continue offering educational tours and classes to the public while also being able to continue their mission of rehabilitating and rescuing animals. They offer a unique experience that all should have the opportunity to explore. Thank you for your consideration. I would be happy to speak with anyone on this matter if more information is needed.” <>Wendy is dying in home hospice, and I’ll be 74 in October, and looking to retire. I'm Wendy's main source of care in Hospice, along with two close friends who have been tireless in their efforts to make Wendy's final days as comfortable as possible. I want to spend more time writing and caring for the love of my life, The DEC has many fine employees, and we’ve been friends with many, from the rangers we need more of in the high Peaks areas, to field workers in Region 5. The DEC bureaucrats in Albany, on the other hand, appear to have developed a vendetta against Wendy and I, in her case because of the violations, and me because I never hesitate to tell the regulators exactly what I believe, a strategy that works well in private enterprise, not so well with government bureaucrats whose actions are not generally understood or followed by the citizenry they are supposed to serve. Wendy and I are already out of the
picture, and the Wildlife
Refuge has a great new team including vets and rehabbers who are ready
and able
to take over. The non-profit had requested that the Collect and Possess
license be
awarded
to Kevin and Jackie Woodcock, owners of SkyLyfeADK, experts on bees and
butterflies, as well as very learned naturalists and teachers. Jackie
is a
frequent contributor to the Almanack, see https://www.adirondackalmanack.com/author/jwoodcock.
Kevin is a skilled craftsman who designs, and with Jackie rebuilds
enclosures
for our mammals and birds of prey, according to ZAA standards. They did not start working for the
Refuge until the
violations Wendy was charged with had already occurred, so there is no
reason
to taint them with the same brush. Wendy and I are reduced to being
landlords,
since we own the property the Refuge is situated on, and the physical
Refuge
would be leased from us, and managed by a
certified 501c3 organization with their own team of producers, writers
and scientists. We have suggested to the DEC again and again that they let a new management team take over the Refuge, run the rehab and collect and possess, and everyone, from the citizenry, the tourists, the students, and to the church, scouting and social groups, everyone wins. With the DEC’s solution, shutting the Refuge down by withdrawing the licenses, everyone loses. This is not about fixing the problem. This is about fixing the blame. This is merely punishment. Wendy
is an artist, not a clerk, and she admitted that she was careless with
the
paperwork, and guilty of violations, even though some of them were
silly and
made no sense, like the ear tag violation involving the bears, while
others
were using the wrong form or not having the paperwork done in a timely
manner. That being said, Wendy has done a hell of a lot more for
wildlife than any of these desk jockeys,
and she knows a hell of a lot more about wildlife than any of
them. These days the DEC seems to be composed more of lawyers and
bureaucrats than rangers and field workers. Anyone
who has worked with wild or captive bred animals, quickly figures out
that
higher mammals are very much like us in the sense that they all have
unique
personalities, which results in different sets of hopes, fears and
expectations. While all bears try to escape, Ahote was obviously very
happy at
the Wildlife Refuge. Those
bears knew me the way your dog knows you. How else do you explain that
both
bears, who had gotten separated after their escape, ended up following
us home individually
through the woods. The brown phase black bear, Luvey, followed us for 4
miles, with
no restraints, collars or leashes, and walked right into her enclosure.
(How
would you control a 250 lb bear anyway?) During this period, I emailed
Joe
Therrien of Special Licenses, asking for DEC recommendations for
rebuilding the
bear enclosure according to their specs. He didn’t even bother to
reply, and I’ll
be happy to provide a copy of my email to him. We
certainly don’t blame the Refuge which adopted the bears for Ahote's
death, as they came, sedated
the bears, helped us carry them to travel containers (travel crates for
lions!), everything
by the book, and brought them to their new home. Luvey is apparently
adopting
well. Another
example of the individuality of animal personalities is Kayla the
Eurasian
Lynx, who was supposed to be flown to a Refuge in Oregon, but was so
freaked
out by the process, we had to rehome her temporarily with another
rehabber. Alex
and Hanna will be driving her to a cat rescue place in Florida in about
a week. As we mentioned previously, when Wendy was forced to rehome her raptors, we warned the regulators that the advanced age of about half of these raptors, along with the fact that they could not fly and were very adjusted to their homes at the Refuge, as well as their handlers, did not bode well for transferring them. Sure enough, half of them died, including a rough legged hawk, Swainson’s hawk, northern goshawk, kestrel, short eared owl and crow. Our animals all receive regular check ups from.the vet, and these raptors were all doing fine, until they were relocated. Many
folks believe Wendy should have been more careful with her paperwork,
and we
agree. But at what point does the actual
welfare of the animals become a factor in the bureaucrats’
decision-making
process. We’ve seen that they don’t care about the economy, and they
don’t care
about the students. At what point do they make decisions that are in
the
interests of the citizens they serve? Which brings us to Kevin and Jackie Woodcock, who were nominated by the non-profit to take over the collect and possess licenses, so that none of the animals would have to be moved. The Woodcocks are naturalists and authors, experts in butterflies, bees and nature generally. Most importantly, they have no connection to Wendy and did not work at the Refuge when her violations occurred, and would be perfect candidates to run the Refuge for the non-profit. As
part of the process of trying to bring the Refuge up to DEC standards,
they redesigned
and rebuilt all the mammal enclosures. This included building a 1,520
foot
perimeter fence which ended once and for all, any critter escape from
the
Refuge grounds. We placed an electric fence in the bear enclosure,
ending any
attempts to dig out. We spent $200,000, of which $140,000 had to be
borrowed from
the bank. Problem solved? Guess again! Attached
is the UPS receipt that confirms that the DEC signed for and received
the Woodcock’s
application on Sept 22nd. According to their own web site,
the DEC must respond to all applications within 15 days. Six weeks
later, they still denied
having received it, even though they signed the USPS receipt! This is a
constant pattern with the DEC. They sign to acknowledge receipt of an
application, and then deny that they received it. You email them, and
they can’t
be bothered to answer. We have streams and streams of emails proving
just that. While
we’re all familiar with the glacial pace of government bureaucracies,
this
brings incompetence to a whole new level, unless it is a strategy of
delay and obfuscate,
that is, wait until the critters are all gone, which they are,
temporarily making the
collect and possess license a moot point. Imagine if the people of New
York
could hold the DEC to the same level of expectation licensees are held
to by the DEC.. It gets crazier. Lyme disease is a major health issue in New York, not at the level of COVID, but still a serious consideration for folks who spend time outdoors. For those new to how Lyme disease works, black legged ticks are the carriers, but not the source of the Borrelia Burgdorferi bacteria. The ticks pick the bacteria up from rodents, and then pass it on to you. The red fox is clearly our best defense against Lyme, because of the sheer volume of rodents they eat. Wouldn’t you think that the state would immediately ban the trapping of any predator that eats rodents, just as it is illegal to hunt birds of prey? Wrong again. The DEC not only encourages trapping, the cruelest and most inefficient form of hunting, as we have rehabbed eagles caught in fox traps, but they encourage trapping and even have a mentoring program for your young children! Unfortunately, the head of Special
Licenses for the DEC
seems determined to ignore all the good the Refuge does for tourism and
education. With Wendy and I out of the picture, all the head of Special
Licenses need do to allow the Refuge to remain open, and allow
citizens,
tourists and students to continue benefiting from the ongoing education
the
Refuge provides, is to approve the Woodcocks as the new Collect and
Possess
License, something he could accomplish with the stroke of a pen today.
As things
stand today, if the current collection of ambassador animals had not
been
rehomed by
October 25th, the DEC had said in a letter to the Refuge
that the DEC would “dispose” of them, a politer way
of
saying they would euthanize them. Doing our part, we found
places
for our ambassador animals to be transferred to. We welcome a public discussion of these
affairs, and a
response from the DEC. If all this strikes you as unfair, and
not in the interests
of the citizens of the state of New York, as well as the citizens and
business
owners in the North Country, or if you just wish to express your
opinion of all
this, please contact Governor Kathy Hochel at 518-474-8390, or mail
to The Honorable Kathy Hochul I you wish to contact DEC Commissioner
Basil Seggos Commissioner
|
Home |
Release of
Rehabbed Animals |
Learn
About Adirondack & Ambassador Wildlife |
Critter
Cams & Favorite Videos |
History
of Cree & the Adirondack Wildlife Refuge |